Optimising the Data Silos Inefficiency in FSCS SCV Regulatory Reporting
Data silos are isolated pockets of information within an organisation that is dispersed throughout numerous databases and are inaccessible to other systems or departments. This phenomenon gives rise to a fragmented data environment, frequently lacking interoperability.
In the banking industry, the prevalence of data silos is a major concern, especially regarding the generation of regulatory reports such as FSCS. Multiple factors contribute to the widespread occurrence of data silos, which include:
- When banks combine or buy other institutions, their data systems generally remain distinct, creating siloed information.
- Numerous financial institutions continue to depend on legacy systems of technology that complicate the process of integrating data.
- A bank’s departments may gather and store data separately, producing silos.
These variables complicate data management, making the generation of FSCS SCV reports inaccurate and delayed for institutions. To enhance operational efficiency and reduce risks, financial institutions must acquire authority over their data.
Challenges Due to Data Silos
According to a recent report by IDC Market Research, businesses lose 20–30% of their annual income potential because of data silos. In addition to being prohibitively expensive, exporting the data can be an incredibly time-consuming process. Customers are dissatisfied when they must repeat information across multiple departments within an organisation, preventing a comprehensive perspective of their journey.
Integration Challenges
Data Extraction and Transformation:
The process of compiling data from various sources for FSCS SCV reports can be laborious and susceptible to inaccuracies. Each silo may have its own format, structure, and definitions, making data extraction, transformation, and loading difficult.Technical Issues:
Integrating data across systems needs technical skills and tools, mandating advanced infrastructure and significant investments.Legacy Systems:
Many banks use IT systems that cannot manage today’s data volume and complexity. These outdated systems typically cannot connect with modern innovation, presenting obstacles.Huge Costs:
Often, substantial investments are necessary to upgrade IT infrastructure, implement data governance practices, and integrate disparate data sources to end data silos. These expenses are likely to be enormous, particularly for smaller financial institutions.
Issues with Data Quality
Quality Shortcomings:
Siloed data is more likely to become inaccurate and inconsistent. Updates may not be reflected in all systems, causing inconsistencies and erroneous reporting. Inaccurate or missing information in the FSCS SCV report can end up in payment delays, exclusion from receiving compensation, or legal complications.Redundancy and Duplication:
The storage of identical data in multiple repositories can result in duplicate data and the unproductive utilisation of storage space. These silos make data consistency difficult, raising error risk. This concerns the FSCS, prompting more inquiry and possible fines.
Visibility and Insights Constraints
Fragmented Customer View:
Banks fail to understand their consumers due to data silos. Efforts to personalise offerings, identify future requirements, and comprehend consumer behaviour are impeded as a result.Poor Decision-Making:
Siloed data limits access to vital information for informed decision-making. Isolated systems may hide crucial data from banks, resulting in inefficient strategies and missed opportunities.
Obstacles in Regulatory Compliance
Issues with Reporting:
Regulators frequently request detailed data. Data silos pose a significant obstacle to the efficient and accurate collection of essential information, which may result in compliance challenges and financial penalties.
Elevated Audit Risk:
Banks encounter challenges in showcasing data governance practices and fulfilling audit obligations due to the fragmented structure of segregated data. This can result in increased costs and prolonged audit periods.
Impairs Agility and Innovation
Limited Data for Analytics and AI:
Data silos hinder sophisticated analytics and AI. Banks or any other financial institutions cannot use their data fully for things like finding frauds, managing risk, and developing new products.Slow Market Response:
Banks cannot swiftly obtain and analyse data to adjust to market movements and client preferences. Such consequences may include lost prospects and a competitive edge.
Security Issues
Increased Attack Surface:
Data silos invite cyberattacks. Security teams must monitor and secure each silo, increasing data security risk and complexity.Risk of Data Leakage:
Data spread across systems increases the risk of unauthorised access, resulting in financial penalties and harm to one’s reputation.
These issues demonstrate data silos’ considerable influence on banking. Banks can achieve numerous advantages, enhance operational effectiveness, and attain a competitive advantage by confronting these challenges head-on and eliminating data silos.
Impact of Data Silos on FSCS SCV Report Generation
A data silo is an isolated data repository under the management of a single department or business unit inside an organisation, similar to how grain and grass in a farm silo are kept separate from the outside world. Usually kept in a stand-alone system, siloed data is frequently incompatible with other sets of data. As a result, accessing and using the data becomes challenging for users in different sections of the organisation.
Data silos can originate from cultural, organisational, or technical factors. They often develop organically in big organisations due to the possibility of autonomous operation, goal-setting, prioritisation, and IT funding by distinct business units. If an organisation lacks a well-thought-out data management strategy, it may result in the creation of data silos, leading to:
- Missing customer title
- Missing customer name
- Invalid date in customer DOB field
- Missing address line
- Missing postcode
- Possible duplicate customer Ids
- Possible ineligible accounts
- Customer detail exist but account detail missing
- Account detail exist but customer detail missing
- Different account balance captured between aggregate balance and accounts balance
- Country code exists in country field
- Country name not matched with ISO standard country name
- Missing or invalid currency code
- Data format issue
- Duplicate passport number
- Invalid company registration number, etc.
The systems would not exchange data without appropriate data integration. This would increase the likelihood of errors and delays by requiring manual intervention to compile the customer’s data for the SCV report.
Thus, the generation of FSCS SCV reports can be significantly impacted in various ways by data silos:
- Since crucial report information is kept separately and is not consolidated, siloed data could fail to adequately represent every aspect of a scenario.
- The reconciliation of data from many sources can be hindered or ruined, as the data definitions and formats are inconsistent.
- Manual data extraction and manipulation become imperative without integration, thereby elevating the potential for human error, and prolonging the creation of FSCS SCV reports.
- Data silos hinder comprehensive understanding of report information, potentially hindering the detection of emerging trends or potential issues.
- As data silos can significantly increase report generation time owing to manual labour, it leads to missed deadlines and potential regulatory non-compliance.
- Manually merging siloed data can lead to higher costs and resource demands for FSCS SCV report generation due to its laborious and error-prone nature.
Breaking Down Data Silos in Banks: A Detailed Analysis
Centralised Data Repository:
This serves as the cornerstone for addressing data silos. Create a central data warehouse with the sole purpose of storing all FSCS-relevant customer information. The implementation of this centralised repository eliminates the necessity to manually gather information from disparate systems and guarantees data consistency.Data Consolidation Process:
Data must be meticulously cleansed and transformed from a variety of sources. This comprises:- Standardising data formats (e.g., date formats, currency codes)
- Removing duplicate entries
- Resolving inconsistencies
Data Integration from Multiple Sources:
In addition to basic account information, it is important to link data from several consumer touchpoints such as accounts, transactions, demographics, and activities to produce an overall picture. With this integrated data strategy, FIs can create a comprehensive Single Customer View for every customer. A more accurate FSCS compensation calculation is possible with the understanding of their financial assets, risk profile, and bank connection.Single Customer View:
Combining data from several platforms creates a single consumer profile. A comprehensive view of a customer’s financial situation, including account balances, historical transactions, and risk profiles, is provided by this Single Customer View (SCV). By adopting this comprehensive perspective, precise identification of qualified clients and their secured deposits under the FSCS initiative is enabled.Data Governance:
Establishing explicit guidelines for data collection, storage, access, and utilisation constitutes defining data policies and standards in strict accordance with the reporting requirements of the FSCS (such as account balances and eligibility requirements). Ensuring consistency across all systems is achieved via standardising data formats, definitions, and code.Data Ownership and Access Control:
Designing strong data governance frameworks that grant ownership of certain data sets to departments while maintaining data security and privacy. Furthermore, access controls must be put in place to limit access according to user responsibilities and requirements, protecting sensitive customer data that is essential for FSCS SCV reporting.Cracking Down Departmental Barriers:
Lack of coordination and communication within departments frequently results in data silos. Collaborative initiatives and the use of interactive data platforms are essential for fostering a culture of information sharing and cooperation.Cloud Computing:
FSCS reporting can be enhanced by utilising cloud-based data processing and storage options. Cloud computing provides:- Scalability for effective handling of massive data volumes.
- Adaptability to changing FSCS reporting needs.
- Cost-effectiveness by removing pricey on-premise infrastructure.
Automation Tools:
Implementing automation tools can significantly improve banks’ FSCS SCV reporting by streamlining the process, reducing manual effort, improving data accuracy, enhancing efficiency, increasing regulatory compliance, and enabling better decision-making. Examples of automation in FSCS SCV reporting include data extraction tools, data quality checks, and AI-powered anomaly detection. By embracing automation, banks can enhance the accuracy, efficiency, and compliance of their reporting, strengthening their position within the regulatory framework and reducing human error.
Macro Global’s Ultra Solution to Combat Data Silos Problem
To overcome data silos problem in the context of regulatory reporting compliance, particularly in the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) Single Customer View (SCV) domain, the following solutions and suites provided by Macro Global can be instrumental:
FSCS SCV Enterprise Solution Suite
SCV Alliance
- Offers a data-driven compliance platform for banks and financial institutions.
- Provides a comprehensive solution with 175 well-classified risks for automatic validation and compliance with FSCS requirements.
SCV Forza
- An automation platform tailored for FSCS SCV reporting.
- Enables streamlined regulatory operations, from data collection and cleansing to audit and screening.
- Can handle various data formats, including structured, semi-structured, unstructured, and database-specific formats. Supports data from various database systems like SQL, NoSQL, and data lakes, enabling seamless extraction and processing of data from different sources.
Key Features
- Utilises an intelligent platform for seamless data integration.
- Manages account segregations effectively to generate precise SCV reports.
- Facilitates seamless integration with Core Banking Systems (CBS) for multi-level data validations.
- Implements AI-based fuzzy logic to prevent data duplication and ensure accurate SCV reports.
- Adheres to ISO standards and FSCS regulatory requirements.
- Provides third-party integrations with databases like FCA DB, Royal Mail DB through API and others.
- Incorporates data mining, cleansing, enrichment, and reconciliation functionalities.
- Enhances operational efficiency by reducing time-consuming inefficiencies.
- Guarantees data accuracy and compliance, ensuring “Green Status Adherence” with PRA.
- Improves risk management by proactively resolving exceptions and eliminating errors.
- Implements robust data protection measures in a secure Azure Cloud environment.
- Incorporates stringent encryption, authentication, and firewall measures for secure data handling.
By leveraging Macro Global’s SCV Alliance and SCV Forza, financial institutions can streamline their regulatory reporting processes, ensure data integrity, and enhance operational efficiency while maintaining compliance with FSCS regulations and industry standards.
SCV Alliance
FSCS SCV Audit Platform
SCV Forza
FSCS SCV Automation Platform
Provide utmost accuracy and Complete Peace of mind
We will be able to help you in whatever the stage of your regulatory reporting programs
Overcoming Threats & Challenges Faced by the Credit Unions
The emergence of fintech companies, mobile banking, and online financial services has changed consumer expectations, forcing credit unions to innovate and update their services to be productive. With more people using banking and credit union services, these organisations face increased challenges to the privacy, security, and well-being of their members.
Credit unions need to leverage technology, including customer-permissioned data, to remain competitive. Meanwhile, operational inefficiencies, increased financial and regulatory constraints, among other reasons, may make it challenging for credit unions to keep up with the quick speed of technological change.
Overcoming challenges is a critical factor in fulfilling the distinct requirements of each institution. This helps the credit union succeed by advancing it in the direction of a dynamic and highly satisfied member base in the future.
Challenges Faced by Credit Unions
Regulatory Compliance
- Credit unions face numerous challenges in navigating the complexities of regulatory compliance and reporting. These include evolving regulations, interpretation challenges, and maintaining data integrity.
- With new regulations and amendments emerging frequently, ensuring compliance can be a significant burden for credit unions, especially with limited resources.
- Regulatory language can be complex, making it difficult for credit unions to understand and implement requirements effectively.
- For UK credit unions, FSCS reporting demands a high degree of accuracy, where even minor data errors can lead to delays, penalties, and reputational damage.
- Accurate Single Customer View (SCV) is crucial for FSCS reporting, requiring data integration from various sources and the inclusion of exclusion files in the SCV.
- Credit unions, often smaller than traditional banks, may have legacy systems or siloed data storage, making this integration complex and resource intensive.
Cybersecurity
- Cybersecurity hazards keep evolving, making it difficult to accurately figure out their prevalence.
- Identity theft, account takeover, credit card fraud, ATM skimming, phishing, wire transfer fraud, loan fraud, check fraud, fraud via mobile banking, and insider fraud are examples of common fraud types.
- Credit unions encounter a substantial obstacle in the form of insider threats deriving from staff and third-party vendors.
- Training employees, running background checks, and keeping an eye on sensitive data security are all necessary to mitigate this risk.
- To guarantee that only reliable parties have access, strict controls for third-party access to data are also required. These controls include vendor inspections and monitoring initiatives.
Legacy System & Manual Processes
- Like other financial institutions, banks and credit unions are prone to operational issues and human errors.
- For the management of member accounts, loan applications, and transactions, some credit unions continue to rely on paper-based systems, which causes processing errors and delays.
- Credit unions’ capacity to swiftly and accurately analyse data is further hampered by these manual procedures, which affects their capacity to offer customised service and make well-informed decisions.
- Credit unions may also lack the resources or expertise to stay up with data collecting and analysis technology.
- Younger, tech-savvy members who prefer customised services may not be interested in in-person visits or phone calls procedures followed by credit unions.
Budget Constraints
- Credit unions must work under minimal operating budgets whilst striving to stay ahead of their competitors. They have a continuous battle to maintain cost control while also investing in new technology and updating their infrastructure.
- Credit unions frequently struggle to find the funds to support such initiatives. Additionally, credit unions find it challenging to hire qualified staff to oversee these kinds of initiatives due to the lack of engineers, budget developers, and other professionals.
Inadequate Customer Data
- Inadequate Customer data presents credit unions with numerous difficulties, especially when it comes to being accurate and up to date.
- It is critical to maintain data integrity since inconsistent data could end up in erroneous reporting and possibly legal repercussions.
- Because of this, it is challenging for credit unions to create successful business plans, recognise and handle risks, adhering to regulatory compliance, including credit and operational risk.
- It is more difficult to generate FSCS SCV reporting with no or minimum data that leads to non-compliance and impacts brand regulation.
- Credit unions are unable to proactively manage these risks when there is a lack of data.
Competing with Major Financial Institutions
- In the commercial world, credit unions encounter significant competition from larger financial institutions.
- Large banks can invest more in more products, sophisticated marketing campaigns, and state-of-the-art technology due to their larger budgets. This phenomenon provides traditional banks with benefits in terms of convenience, loan options, and brand awareness.
- Credit unions find it more difficult to extend their business, find new member segments, enhance offerings, as a result, particularly from those who are drawn to the attraction of the newest financial tools or the convenience of a wide branch network.
Navigating the Challenges Faced by Credit Unions
Combatting Cybersecurity Threats
- Multi-factor authentication enhances security by asking users to enter a password and unique code sent to their mobile devices.
- With end-to-end encryption (E2EE), data remains secure between systems or devices. Banks and credit unions can protect account transfers and customer-retailer payments with E2EE mobile and online payments.
- Regular security audits and penetration testing enable the credit union to detect and fix system and network vulnerabilities before attackers take advantage of it.
- Insider attacks are prevented by running background checks and imposing stringent access controls on third-party vendors.
- Implementing risk-based authentication lets banks and credit unions customise their security processes to each customer transaction.
- Offering training to staff on cybersecurity and best practices, including hacker methods and social engineering prevention, helps in fighting against cyberattacks.
Upgrading the Legacy System
- Modernise the technology infrastructure by investing in digital solutions for account management, loan processing, and transactions. This can involve implementing new software and hardware systems that streamline these processes.
- Automating manual processes can improve efficiency and accuracy. By identifying repetitive tasks that are currently performed manually, credit unions can implement software or robotic solutions.
- Leveraging data analytics tools help to gain insights from member data and offer personalised products/services.
- Offering online and mobile banking options cater to tech-savvy members who prefer convenience.
Winning the Budget Constraints
- Cloud solutions offer cost-effective alternatives to on-premises IT infrastructure to solve budget restrictions. Consider transferring IT services to the cloud to decrease hardware, maintenance, and upgrade costs.
- To partner with other credit unions to share resources and technology investments. By pooling resources and sharing the costs, credit unions can benefit from economies of scale and reduce their individual financial burden.
- Prioritise technological investments with the highest ROI. Assessing technological choices and picking those that can boost efficiency is essential.
- Outsourcing non-core functions by employing third parties can help with budget restrictions.
Obtaining Data Adequacy
- Implement data quality management practices that involve establishing processes and procedures to ensure the accuracy, consistency, and completeness of data.
- Investing in data integration tools that can help consolidate data from various sources. By integrating data from different systems and sources, organisations can create a seamless Single Customer View (SCV).
- Leverage data analytics to generate actionable insights for better decision making.
Taking the Lead Over Competitors
- By understanding the needs and interests of their members, credit unions can create niche offerings that target particular member demographics.
- Investment in advanced online and mobile banking technologies allows credit unions to deliver smooth and user-friendly digital banking solutions to their members.
- Credit unions can team up with fintech companies to use cutting-edge technology without investing much to compete with large financial institutions. This solution lets credit unions leverage fintech partners’ expertise and creative solutions.
- Focus on building a strong brand identity that highlights the unique advantages of credit unions.
Overcoming Regulatory Challenges
- Firstly, investing in right compliance management tools such as to manage customer data, automate their regulatory requirements, track regulatory changes, and simplify reporting.
- Secondly, partnering with industry leading compliance experts from regulatory compliance consulting firms can provide guidance on interpreting regulations and maintaining data integrity.
- Lastly, industry collaboration by sharing best practices and resources with other credit unions can help ease the compliance burden.
Elevate Credit Union’s Regulatory Compliance with the Power of SCV Forza
SCV Forza by Macro Global is a comprehensive platform that helps credit unions with FSCS regulatory reporting, overcoming challenges:
- SCV Forza offers Credit Unions a sophisticated platform for managing and automating FSCS SCV reporting, in conformity with regulatory criteria.
- To ensure data quality and privacy, the solution integrates with CBS (Core Banking Systems) or any accounting platform and uses AI-based fuzzy logic to validate multi-level data, prevent data duplication, and generate accurate SCV reports in the correct format for FSCS submission.
- Featuring ISO compliance, high-level data security like multi-factor authentication, malware protection, 256-bit encryption, periodic VAPT, firewall protection, and safe data capturing, SCV Forza helps credit unions satisfy strict industry standards and regulations.
- Automation and streamlining regulatory procedures can help credit unions minimise compliance reporting time and inefficiencies, promoting the competitive edge of credit unions.
- Leveraging Microsoft’s enterprise-grade security standards, the solution offers a secure environment for data processing and storage.
- SCV Forza follows strict data retention policies to manage data securely and in compliance with PRA regulations.
- The solution reduces the possibility of exceptions, errors, and data inaccuracies, giving credit unions peace of mind and assuring accurate and secure reporting.
These features collectively contribute to a secure and compliant environment for credit unions and other financial institutions using the SCV Forza solution. If you need more detailed information on any specific security feature, feel free to contact us.
Transform your regulatory compliance with SCV Forza – Secure your future today!
SCV Alliance
FSCS SCV Audit Platform
SCV Forza
FSCS SCV Automation Platform
Provide utmost accuracy and Complete Peace of mind
We will be able to help you in whatever the stage of your regulatory reporting programs
Best Practices for Resolving SCV Data Duplication Issues for Fully FSCS Compliant
Duplicate data in SCV Reporting is a significant issue that impedes an organisation’s ability to derive meaningful insights, occupies pricey storage space, disrupts customer data, and ultimately results in erroneous business decisions. When data is extracted for a project, IT managers, data analysts, and business users encounter duplicate data issue. However, the effects of duplicate and polluted data on the entire organisation become apparent when they cause a business initiative to fail or experience a delay.
What is SCV Duplicate Data?
Duplicate data are identical data entries that are stored in the same data storage system or multiple systems across the organisation. A variety of data fields including customer names, primary address, contact number, date of birth, and so forth, are susceptible to duplication in the banking industry. Duplication can occur because of human mistake, system failure, or malicious activity. Data duplication is more complicated than we think. The following types can help you assess duplicate data issues.
Types of Duplicate Data in FSCS SCV Reporting
Banks and other financial institutions face a major issue with data duplication, which affects data accuracy, system performance, and storage efficiency. Some prevalent types are listed below:
1. Identical Duplicates Within a Single System
Cause: Data entry errors, copying information without proper checks.
Example: A customer’s account details are entered twice due to a typo.
Impact: Easy to detect but duplication causes manual effort to fix and slow down processing
2. Identical Duplicates Across Multiple Systems
Cause: Redundant data backups, saving information in different formats across systems.
Example: A customer record exists in both the core banking system and a separate database, both with identical data.
Impact: Due to this duplication, the SCV report’s overall customer and account counts are overvalued giving an erroneous impression of the number of customers and total account holdings. Also, this creates inconsistencies and reduces data reliability for FSCS SCV reporting and analytics.
3. Duplicates with Variations Across Multiple Systems
Cause: All systems do not maintain a constant update of changes to customer information (phone number, address, title).
Example: A client modifies their email address through the online banking portal; however, the previous email address remains in the CRM system.
Impact: Makes it harder to get an entire view of the customer and impedes effective communication.
4. Non-Exact Duplicates (Most Challenging)
Cause: Inconsistent formatting, a lack of standardised data definitions, variations in data entry (typos, abbreviations).
Example: One system may record the name “Andrew Johnson” for a customer, whereas another may read “A. Johnson.”
Impact: Hardest to identify, leads to incorrect FSCS SCV reporting, hampers the identification of fraud, and results in substandard customer service.
Causes of Duplicate Data in FSCS SCV Reporting
Organisations could face grave consequences from duplicate data in generating FSCS SCV reports. The primary reasons for duplicate data are as follows:
1. Errors with Manual Data Entry
Multiple records may be created because of human error, misspellings, and typographical errors made during data entry. For instance, human error could result in the entry of a customer’s phone number twice in slightly different formats like the inclusion of hyphen, space, etc.
2. Ineffective Data Integration
Duplicates may arise when spreadsheets are used to transfer data between other departments or systems. Let us say a branch lists new customer accounts on an Excel spreadsheet. If this data is not properly integrated with the core banking system, it is possible that duplicate entries will be created.
3. Absence of Standardisation
Duplicate data can be produced by inconsistent formats, abbreviations, or differences in data entry between systems. For example: The instances like the subtle differences in data entry, such as typos (e.g., “Roger” vs. “Rojer”) or the use of abbreviations (e.g., “St.” vs. “Street”) can lead to duplicates.
4. Absence of a Core Banking System
Customer data could be dispersed among several independent databases in financial organisations lacking a centralised core banking system. Duplicate consumer information can arise due to the lack of a unified platform, leading to the formation of data silos across multiple systems.
5. System Upgrades and Migrations
Moving data during system upgrades or structuring data to new banking systems can act as a haven for duplicates. Incomplete data transfer methods, inconsistent data mapping between old and new systems, and the requirement for manual intervention during migration are all factors that could contribute to the unintentional duplication of customer, account, or other crucial entries in the SCV report.
6. Issues with Data Synchronisation
Duplicate entries may arise when many databases or systems try to sync data without enough cooperation. For some tasks, certain banks may have internal legacy systems. When data needs to be transmitted across systems, these bespoke manual systems may produce duplicate data if they fail to properly integrate with the primary data infrastructure.
7. Poor Data Quality Controls
Duplicate data may enter the system if there are insufficient controls and checks in place to ensure data quality.
8. Absence of Discrete Identifiers
Systems that lack unique identifier constraints or depend on non-unique identifiers may encounter difficulties in mitigating the occurrence of duplicate data.
9. Workflow Procedures
Duplicate data could accidentally be created by business processes and workflows that lack clear standards and controls.
10. Issues with Data Governance
The same customer or account information may be independently collected and stored by many departments or individuals because of the lack of defined norms for data ownership and management. Repeated entries in different systems are caused by this lack of data governance.
Despite good intentions, integrating siloed data sources might cause duplication. Differences in data formats, nomenclature conventions, and definitions among different systems may give rise to records that appear to be distinct but are, in fact, representative of the same entity.
It is vital to tackle these sources of data duplication to guarantee the precision and effectiveness of data administration in a company.
The Need to Eliminate Duplicate Data
1. Data Accuracy:
Inaccurate analysis and reports could result from duplicate data, which can also influence the quality of business decisions.
2. Operational Efficiency:
By piling up in databases, duplicate data reduces workplace productivity. Eliminating duplicates improves operational efficiency by streamlining data management procedures.
3. Cost-effectiveness:
Excessive storage space is used by redundant data, which also raises infrastructure expenses.
4. Client Experience:
Inconsistent data and irregular client interactions may arise from duplicates.
5. Regulatory Compliance:
To follow data protection laws, regulated sectors like banks must maintain accurate and compliant records, free from duplicate data.
Impact of Data Duplication on FSCS SCV Reporting
Data duplication has several major effects on Single Customer View (SCV) reporting:
- The accuracy of SCV data can be impacted by duplicate records, which can cause reporting errors. Duplicate data can distort reporting metrics and give an inaccurate picture of how customers engage and behave.
- SCV reporting can mislead concerning consumer behaviour, preferences, and business interactions due to duplicate data.
- It takes more time and money to deal with duplicate data, causing resource drain. The process of discovering, merging, and maintaining duplicate information takes more work than other data utilisation techniques for SCV reporting and analysis.
- Duplicate data can give rise to inconsistent customer experiences, as it prevents banks from having a holistic view of their customer base.
- Compliance with consumer data regulations might be difficult with duplicate data. This might have an impact on adherence to laws like the GDPR and have negative legal and financial repercussions.
- Implementing suitable technology and strategies for data cleaning and deduplication processes is essential to addressing these issues and ensuring the dependability and accuracy of SCV reporting.
Data Deduplication
Data deduplication is the process of finding and removing duplicate data entries from a storage system or dataset. Data deduplication reduces redundant copies of data, which helps to increase productivity, optimise storage capacity, and improve data quality. This procedure is particularly effective for large datasets or storage systems, since redundant data could take up precious space and affect the overall performance and quality of the data.
How Data Cleansing is Done via Data Deduplication?
Data deduplication is an essential element of data cleansing, as it facilitates the establishment and maintenance of dependable customer records, adherence to regulatory obligations, and functional clarity in FSCS SCV reporting and transactions.
Identification of Duplicate Data
Duplicate records are detected through the utilisation of automated tools that employ similarity algorithms, data pattern matching, or unique identifiers.
Sophisticated algorithms analyse the data to find patterns and similarities between entries, potentially marking duplicates for additional inspection.
Eliminate or Merge the Identified Data
Choosing whether to remove duplicate entries while retaining the most accurate and comprehensive collection of data, or to integrate them by aggregating data, is the subsequent step after discovering duplicate records.
In certain cases, the duplicates are merged and the data is aggregated to establish a single, correct record and resolve redundant or contradictory data.
Standardisation of Data
FSCS SCV reports rely on data standardisation to ensure accurate information. This process enforces consistent formatting guidelines across fields like customer names, addresses, email addresses, and phone numbers. Standardising data formats makes it easier to identify and manage duplicate entries. For example, if two customer records have the same name with different standards like David Warner and D. Warner, standardisation would ensure they appear identically as David Warner, enabling efficient detection and removal of duplicate entries. This not only improves data quality but also ensures accurate information about a bank’s customer base and account holdings.
Allocation of Unique Identifiers
Every entry is assigned a unique identifier, which prevents duplication and makes deduplication operations easier in the future.
The aforementioned identifiers function as keys to differentiate and label specific records contained within the dataset.
Automated Matching
Sophisticated algorithms and fuzzy matching methods are used to compare and match records sensibly.
Rather than depending just on precise matches, these techniques make use of fuzzy logic to take into consideration minute differences or inconsistencies in the data to ensure the presence of accurate FSCS SCV reporting.
Validation & Verification
After deduplication, the data is thoroughly validated to ensure that redundant data has been successfully eliminated without inadvertently removing important information.
The goal of validation checks is to confirm that the deduplication procedure improves data consistency and correctness.
Scheduled Maintenance
As fresh data enters the system, scheduled data deduplication operations are instituted to continuously find and fix duplicates.
Organisations can preserve data integrity and lessen the gradual buildup of duplicate data by employing a regular deduplication strategy.
By means of this all-encompassing procedure, organisations can promise a single, precise, and unified view of their customer data.
How SCV Forza Resolves Duplicate Data?
SCV Forza is an automated, reliable, and pioneering solution specifically engineered to optimise and augment the generation and administration of Single Customer View reports in the financial industry.
SCV Forza ensures the precision and integrity of the Single Customer View (SCV) reporting process by employing several strategies to circumvent data duplication. Here’s an extensive overview of how SCV Forza helps to overcome data duplication:
Automated Data Integration
Identification and Reconciliation
The platform uses fuzzy logic based on artificial intelligence to find and fix duplicate entries or incorrect data points in the dataset.
This lessens the effect of duplicates in the final reporting data by allowing the system to effectively match and merge linked entries.
Data Validation and Control
Stringent data validation and control procedures are carried out by SCV Forza through interaction with Core Banking Systems (CBS) and other external data sources.
By finding and removing duplicate information, these processes assist in guaranteeing that the final SCV reports are devoid of unnecessary or erroneous customer data.
Comprehensive Data Cleansing
By identifying and integrating customer records that may exist in multiple datasets or accounts, SCV Forza performs exhaustive data cleansing procedures to eradicate duplication.
The likelihood of duplicate SCV reports is diminished by the platform’s assurance of a pristine and consolidated dataset.
Reports of Exceptions and Manual Intervention
SCV Forza creates exception reports showing possible duplicate entries for manual examination and intervention in situations where automated procedures might not fully resolve potential duplications.
This adds an extra degree of confidence by enabling financial institutions to resolve any outstanding data duplications before the submission of the SCV reports.
Additionally, SCV Forza encompasses the following features:
- Maintains data security throughout the lifecycle in accordance with ISO standards and regulatory mandates.
- Automated reconciliation throughout the accounting period and a comprehensive audit trail are available.
- Improves data quality and delivers accurate SCV reports for automated decision-making.
- Provides periodic regulatory updates to ensure compliance.
Transform your data management with SCV Forza! Experience the power of automated data cleansing, efficient duplicate data removal, and precise SCV reporting.
Book a demo now to see SCV Forza in action and take the first step towards streamlined and compliant data management.
FAQs for Resolving FSCS SCV Duplicates
Why do data duplicates exist in SCV regulatory reporting?
Data duplicates in SCV regulatory reporting can arise due to several factors:
- Manual data entry errors like misspellings, and typographical errors can lead to duplicate records.
- Ineffective Data Integration
- Inconsistent formats, abbreviations, or differences in data entry
- Absence of a core banking system or using legacy systems leads to data silos.
- Incomplete data transfer methods, inconsistent data mapping, and manual intervention during migration.
- Multiple databases or systems trying to sync data without cooperation.
- Insufficient controls and checks.
- Absence of discrete identifiers.
- Lack of clear standards and controls in business processes.
- Issues with data governance.
What are all the common fields with errors in regulatory reporting?
- Misspellings, inconsistencies, or missing middle names in customer name
- Incorrect date of birth or formats
- Incorrect addresses, missing components in the street, city, state, country, or ZIP code
- Incorrect or missing nationality information
- Incorrect or duplicate account numbers
- Inaccurate balances or missing information
- Incorrect transaction amounts, dates, or descriptions
Generally, these errors are due to:
- Data Duplication: Duplicate records or entries
- Formatting Errors: Incorrect formatting of dates, numbers, or other data elements
- Missing Information: Incomplete or missing data fields
- Calculation Errors: Incorrect calculations or formulas
- System Integration Issues: Errors arising from inconsistencies between different systems or databases
What are the steps involved in removing the duplicate data?
The steps involved in removing duplicate data in an FSCS SCV report are as follows:
- Automated tools detect duplicate records using similarity algorithms, data pattern matching, or unique identifiers.
- The duplicate entries are either removed or integrated by aggregating data.
- Consistent formatting guidelines are enforced across fields.
- Each entry is assigned a unique identifier to prevent duplication.
- Automated algorithms and fuzzy matching methods compare and match records sensibly.
- Data is thoroughly validated post-deduplication to ensure data consistency and correctness.
- Regular data deduplication operations are initiated to maintain data integrity and reduce the gradual buildup of duplicate data.
How will data auditing solve the duplicate data?
- Prevents Duplicates: Identifies duplicate records through automation
- Ensures Data Integrity: Regular audits via strategically placed checkpoints can identify and resolve duplicate values, contributing to accurate analysis and decision-making.
- Improves Data Quality: Removes duplicate values, enhancing data quality by eliminating redundancies and inconsistencies.
What is Data duplication?
Data duplication is defined as the presence of similar data entries inside the same data storage system or across multiple systems within the organisation.
Duplicates can occur in a variety of data fields, including customer names, contact information, and other details, and can be caused by human error, system failure, or inconsistent formatting.
Data duplication significantly influences report accuracy, system performance, and data reliability.
SCV Alliance
FSCS SCV Audit Platform
SCV Forza
FSCS SCV Automation Platform
Provide utmost accuracy and Complete Peace of mind
We will be able to help you in whatever the stage of your regulatory reporting programs
Fortifying Banks Against FSCS SCV Risks: The Power of Regulatory Reporting Software
The Financial Services Compensation Scheme serves as a line of protection for depositors, ensuring that their hard-earned funds are safe in the instance of a bank failure. Despite providing support, banks pose inherent risks that could lead to FSCS claims, causing major financial obligations for the scheme and financial system disruption. This blog examines how regulatory reporting software emerges as an effective tool for mitigating the inherent FSCS SCV compliance risks that banks confront.
Understanding Bank & Firm Failures
Reasons Behind Bank Failures
Bank failures can have notable implications for individuals, businesses, and the entire financial system. Among the primary causes are the following:
Economic Crisis:
Result in substantial losses for banks due to the default of loans by companies and individuals during such economic downturn. Failing asset values can also deplete a bank’s capital base, making it prone to losses.Poor Risk Management:
Lending massive funds to high-risk borrowers or investing extensively in unstable markets can put banks to enormous financial losses.Inadequate Regulatory Compliance:
Banks must comply with several regulations to guarantee their safety and integrity. Noncompliance can result in financial penalties, reputational damage, and operational license revocation, resulting in bank failures.Involving in Fraudulent Activities:
Banks can suffer substantial financial losses due to internal and external misconduct, including embezzlement and cyberattacks, respectively. Money laundering can also destabilise banks and weaken financial system credibility.
These failures not only disrupt the financial system but also trigger FSCS claims, potentially exceeding the scheme’s resources. However, several factors contribute to FSCS SCV risks.
Challenges & Risks on Data Accuracy and Validation
Data Entry Errors:
Typos, inconsistencies, and duplicate entries within the SCV can result from manual data entering. Identifying eligible depositors and their FSCS compensation holdings might be confusing.Data Integration Issues:
It can be difficult to integrate data from various bank systems, which can result in duplicate and inconsistent data inside the SCV.Mergers and Acquisitions:
Customer data consolidation is difficult when banks merge or acquire other organisations, leading to duplicate accounts and inaccurate SCV records.Data Inaccuracy:
Incomplete customer data can lead to miscalculations of FSCS compensation.Data Privacy and Protection:
Improper control and unauthorised access to customer data, leading to the risk of poor data quality and potential data breaches.Inaccurate Account Segregations:
Pose challenges for financial institutions in tracking key metrics, generating reliable reports, and posing compliance concerns with regulatory bodies.Synthetic Identity Theft:
Fraudsters can compile facts to construct fake identities, resulting in the creation of duplicated accounts within the SCV, which could cause the FSCS to overcompensate.Misidentification of Eligible Depositors:
Can lead to delays in compensation, causing unnecessary hardship for depositors.Manual Processes:
Time-consuming and error-prone manual data gathering and reporting for FSCS claims.
These factors can exacerbate FSCS SCV risks and ruin public trust in the banking system.
Need for Regulatory Reporting Software
SCV Regulatory reporting software provides crucial data regarding a bank’s operations, financial health, and risk profile. It goes beyond meeting PRA criteria. By implementing this, it enables financial institutions to proactively mitigate FSCS SCV risks:
Improving Data Accuracy and Consistency
Manual data collection and reporting for the SCV is prone to errors and discrepancies. By automating these procedures, SCV Regulatory Reporting Software guarantees the precision of data for essential reports such as the Exclusion File and core regulatory submissions. This facilitates regulators in obtaining a transparent and dependable understanding of a bank’s clientele and assets, enabling them to:
Detect Early Warning Signs:
Regulators can spot concerns like excessive deposit concentration or insufficient capital reserves relative to the FSCS compensation ceiling with accurate data. Early intervention can avert bank failures from such risks.Ease FSCS Payouts:
Clear SCV data guarantees fast and effective processing of FSCS payments for eligible depositors in the scenario of a bank failure, thereby mitigating financial distress.
Optimised Processes and Efficiency
SCV reporting performed manually is resource-intensive and time-consuming. Bank staff can focus on key business tasks and risk management using SCV Regulatory Reporting Software, which automates data collection, validation, and reporting. It also allows banks to invest more in proactive risk mitigation, minimising FSCS claims.
Enhanced Risk Management
By integrating with pre-existing risk management systems, SCV Regulatory Reporting Software offers a comprehensive overview of the customer base of a financial institution and the corresponding risks. This facilitates enhanced analysis of:
Concentration Risk:
Identifying accounts beyond FSCS compensation limitations or with a high deposit concentration with one client provides proactive risk minimisation.
Operational Risk:
Ensuring SCV data accuracy and integrity reduces computation and reporting errors, decreasing operational risks that could lead to FSCS claims.
Reduced Regulatory Scrutiny
A bank’s dedication to regulatory conformance with the PRA is demonstrated through its timely and accurate reporting of SCVs. This mitigates the likelihood of incurring penalties or interventions and cultivates favourable relations with regulatory bodies.
A decrease in regulatory scrutiny results in reduced financial obligations for the bank, which in turn contributes to a strengthened financial standing and a reduced likelihood of invoking FSCS claims.
Maintaining a Leading Edge
Banks are kept abreast of the ever-changing SCV and FSCS regulations by regulatory reporting software. This enables banks to proactively confront emerging financial offences or regulatory modifications to FSCS compensation limits, among other threats, thereby ensuring continuous compliance.
Improved customer Insights:
As SCV consolidates client data, banks can better understand their customers and personalise their products and services.Better customer Service:
Accurate and accessible client data improves and speeds up customer service.Data-Driven Decision Making:
With the help of the customer picture, banks can allocate resources, manage risks, and develop new products based on data.
How to Choose the Right SCV Regulatory Reporting Software?
Understanding Your Needs
Size and Complexity of the Bank:
Think about whether you need a simple solution for a small bank or a more complex system for a large financial organisation. Current Systems and Infrastructure:
Determine the extent of integration necessary with your current core banking system, data management systems, and reporting tools.Growth Prospects:
Select scalable and adaptable software that can accommodate a projected rise in data volume and reporting complexity of your bank.
Important Features to Consider
Ensuring Data Accuracy and Validation:
To guarantee optimal data accuracy, search for software that incorporates automated data cleansing, validation, and error detection functionalities.Exclusion File Management:
It is critical to have robust management capabilities for exclusion files. Make sure the software makes it easier to recognise ineligible accounts and to have clean audit trails.Dormant Account Management:
The software ought to facilitate the quick detection and reporting of dormant accounts in accordance with relevant SCV laws.Automated Deadline Management and Report Generation:
This feature can help avoid delays and make sure that SCV reports are sent to the FSCS on time by automatically generating reports and sending reminders.Regulatory Updates:
It is critical to receive periodic updates regarding the evolving FSCS and regulatory requirements. Choose software that informs and adapts reporting procedures.Security of Data:
To protect sensitive financial and customer information, the software should employ robust data encryption protocols.User-Friendliness:
Intuitive interface of the SCV regulatory reporting software will offer a smooth experience for the banking staff.User Access Controls:
To guarantee that only those with permission can access critical data and reporting features, granular user access controls are crucial.Total Cost of Ownership (TCO):
Consider the initial software cost, recurring maintenance fees, training charges, and any additional implementation costs to opt for an affordable solution.Training and Implementation:
Assess the vendor’s assistance with the training and implementation procedures. This practice guarantees a seamless transition and enables your personnel to efficiently utilise the software.Vendor Assistance:
To ensure the best possible software utilisation and troubleshoot any issues, consider robust technical and continuous customer assistance from the vendor.
Overcoming FSCS SCV Risks with MG’s SCV Solution Suite
Macro Global’s SCV software goes beyond simply automating regulatory reporting. SCV Forza and SCV Alliance are equipped with features designed to address the critical needs of banks in ensuring FSCS compliance and regulatory reporting efficiency, thereby empowering banks. Its key features include:
- The Highly 10th Gen Single Customer View platform to automate FSCS SCV reporting.
- Data aggregation capabilities to integrate and manage account segregations efficiently.
- Ensure accurate SCV reports that comply with FSCS requirements.
- Integrate seamlessly with Core Banking Systems (CBS) to facilitate multi-level data validations.
- Employ data mining, cleansing, enrichment, and reconciliation functions to address data-related inaccuracies.
- Implement AI-based fuzzy logic for precise data validations and control procedures.
- Prevent data duplication through robust validation processes to generate accurate SCV reports swiftly.
- Comply with ISO standards and FSCS regulatory requirements for data security.
- Implement a high level of data security throughout the regulatory lifecycle.
- Protect SCV output files with encrypted password mechanisms for enhanced security.
- Implement multi-factor authentication mechanisms for secure data transmission.
- Manage exclusion files and handle dormant accounts, ensuring accurate identification and reporting of accounts ineligible for FSCS compensation.
- Regularly conduct Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing (VAPT) to maintain robust security.
- Access well-classified 175 SCV Audit Checkpoints to track high & medium risk data issues.
- Utilise third-party integrations for data validation against reputable databases.
- Offer guidance on data governance and operational best practices in the FSCS reporting landscape.
- Experts to optimise regulatory reporting processes and ensure compliance.
By implementing these strategies and utilising a comprehensive regulatory reporting software solution like SCV Alliance and SCV Forza Solution Suite, banks can effectively mitigate FSCS SCV risks, streamline reporting processes, enhance data quality, and ensure compliance with regulatory standards.
Leverage the product maturity and experience of Macro Global’s SCV Alliance and SCV Forza to navigate complex FSCS risks.
SCV Alliance
FSCS SCV Audit Platform
SCV Forza
FSCS SCV Automation Platform
Provide utmost accuracy and Complete Peace of mind
We will be able to help you in whatever the stage of your regulatory reporting programs
Focusing on Depositor Fears and FSCS Regulatory Compliance Guidelines for Firms
The January 2024 sanction imposed by the Prudential Regulation Authority on HSBC Bank plc and HSBC UK Bank plc for deficiencies in depositor protection identification and notification, in addition to the US banking crisis of 2023, highlight the criticality of depositor protection regulation.
These incidents illustrate that strict data governance and quality standards are necessary for depositor protection and Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) compliance.
The consequences of insufficient data management practices are evident in HSBC’s penalty, which ranks as the second most significant fine imposed by the PRA whereas the US banking crisis of 2023 exposes systemic vulnerabilities brought on by liquidity concerns and unstable markets.
Need for Public Focus on Depositor Protection
In recent years, a confluence of factors has elevated the significance of the public and regulatory mandate to safeguard depositors. Listed below are the primary reasons:
Current Bankruptcies and Volatility in the Market
Recalling the 2008 financial crisis, the failure of prominent banks revealed the susceptibility of financial institutions/firms to economic stagnation and poor administration.
These occurrences serve as an intense reminder of the significance of depositor protection schemes in mitigating financial disaster and preserving public confidence.
Increased Public Scrutiny and Fear
Bank failures damage public trust in the financial system by depriving depositors of their funds. This can inhibit economic development by causing individuals to be reluctant to invest or save money.
The attention on protecting depositors makes sure that regulatory bodies are held responsible for keeping depositors’ money safe.
Dynamic Financial Environment
Current depositor protection schemes must be reassessed in light of the emergence of Fintech firms and novel financial products. Depositor protection strategies must be adaptive and effective across all financial institutions, in accordance with regulators.
Global Harmonisation and Standards
International cooperation and harmonisation of depositor protection regimes are becoming increasingly important to guarantee a uniform standard of protection for depositors in financial institutions and countries.
Regulatory Environment Changes
Understanding depositor protection schemes and ensuring that such schemes continue to be effective amidst the ever-changing financial markets via regular reviews and updates are essential.
What Should Firms be Conscious of?
Financial Institutions (FIs) need to be cognizant of several crucial factors in the light of Depositor Protection. Here are the key considerations and implications they should be mindful of:
Rigorous Data Governance and Quality
Firms need to prioritise robust data governance and quality practices to ensure compliance with depositor protection regulations. This entails maintaining accurate, consistent, and up-to-date depositor records, aligning with the granular requirements of the Single Customer View (SCV). Also, they need to review their SCV reporting capabilities and adapt to the changing environment.
Timely Data Management
Recognising the need for real-time or near-real-time data processing capabilities is essential. FIs should ensure that their data management systems can update depositor information within the 24-hour window mandated by SCV requirements to enable timely compensation for affected depositors.
Handling Beneficiary Accounts
Firms should accurately identify beneficiary accounts owned by their customers, which may not be covered by FSCS but require inclusion in SCV files as per PRA rules.
Identification and Rectification of Data Challenges
FIs should focus on identifying and rectifying data quality issues, such as duplicated records, discrepancies in account status, and lack of consistency across records.
Metadata Management
Utilising up-to-date metadata is crucial for SCV reporting accuracy, as outdated or incorrect metadata can impact the eligibility and treatment of accounts in the SCV files.
Adoption of Advanced Data Governance Tools
FIs should consider deploying advanced data governance and quality tooling to address inaccuracies and inconsistencies in depositor records. Implementation of advanced analytics, automation technology, and machine learning can enhance overall data integrity.
The implementation of automation technology can guarantee precise and streamlined FSCS SCV reporting. The automation platform collects and cleanses data from various sources, structures and enriches it, performs automated validation checks, and conducts rigorous audits to ensure regulatory compliance.
Handling Non-Traditional Currencies
Varied treatment of non-traditional currencies like Cryptocurrencies poses challenges, as their coverage under FSCS differs and requires specific handling in SCV reporting.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) provides regulatory guidance for depositors and deposit-taking institutions regarding Electronic Money, including cryptocurrencies. The guidance emphasises transparency and protection for retail customers. It also addresses risks from tokenization and consumer confusion. The guidance outlines standards for issuing E-Money or regulated stable coins and requires innovations in deposit-taking from retail customers to comply with FSCS protection limits. Deposit-taking institutions must navigate these regulations to inspire consumer trust and confidence.
Integration of Regulatory Data Requirements with Business Objectives
Firms should align SCV and other regulatory data requirements with broader business objectives, emphasising the integration of data management into a strategic asset.
Managing Deposit Aggregators
Understanding the status of accounts managed by deposit aggregators is essential, as their treatment in SCV files may differ based on their legal structure and beneficiary account classification.
Funds under Non-disclosure
Deposits in suspense accounts, often excluded from SCV files, must be properly managed and allocated for compliance, especially in cases of insolvency, to ensure timely resolution and evaluation by FSCS.
Regulatory Changes and Reconciliation
Adapting to regulatory changes and ensuring thorough reconciliation from source to reporting is crucial. FIs must stay updated on regulatory requirements and integrate changes into their SCV reporting systems.
Firm’s Preparedness and Response
Firms should be well-prepared to respond to testing requests or questions from regulatory authorities regarding their SCV framework and reporting.
Internal and external data testing of SCV files, along with deeper dive audits and reviews, can instill confidence in the firm’s reporting capabilities.
Partnering with Data Management Solution Providers
Collaboration with data management solution providers like Macro Global can support FIs/Firms, fostering a culture of data excellence as part of a comprehensive data strategy.
Unlocking New Opportunities by Integrating SCV with Data Strategies
Financial Institutions (FIs) derive immense value from integrating Single Customer View (SCV) with broader data strategies.
- SCV data is indispensable for accurate reporting on depositor protection schemes such as FSCS, which is critical for regulatory compliance.
- Firms are able to discern customer requirements, preferences, and potential risks through the analysis of combined SCV and customer behaviour data, which facilitates data-driven decision making and targeted marketing initiatives.
- By using this data, financial products and services can be improved, offerings can be made more personalised, and client retention tactics can be strengthened.
- SCV data facilitates early detection signs for potential fraudulent activities, money trafficking, or credit defaults, thereby contributing to risk management.
- It eliminates data silos and improves resource allocation, contributing to increased operational efficiency.
- Firms can also enhance their products and services by anticipating future financial behaviour and consumer requirements through the use of predictive analytics enabled by SCV data.
Macro Global's FSCS SCV Solution Suite: Streamlined FSCS SCV Reporting
Efficient regulatory solution provider offers a comprehensive solution that not only meets but exceeds FSCS SCV reporting requirements, standing as your trusted partner.
The solution needs to be built upon a foundation of best practices, aligned with a proactive approach to regulatory changes, and extend an unwavering commitment to operational resilience. Also, they must understand the FCA’s operational guidelines and translate them into actionable compliance strategies.
An efficient SCV solution must meet the following criteria:
- Generate accurate and timely SCV effectiveness & exclusion reports that reflect the latest regulatory changes.
- Leverage advanced data cleansing, enrichment, and reconciliation methods to guarantee accurate SCV reports, addressing depositor concerns about duplicate records.
- Conducting efficient audits of generated SCV reports using checkpoints, addressing depositor concerns about data accuracy, and preventing duplicate records.
- Maintain high data quality standards through integrations with core banking systems and multi-level validations.
- Follow strict data governance principles, ensuring data security and compliance with FSCS demands. Additionally, they are adept in proactive risk management, fostering a robust infrastructure to manage disruptions.
- Adhere to industry-leading security protocols and be hosted in a secure cloud environment, protecting sensitive data and upholding regulatory compliance throughout the reporting lifecycle.
- Reduce compliance burdens with automated solutions that stay ahead of evolving regulations.
- Benefits you via ongoing support from subject matter experts, ensuring peace of mind with data accuracy and compliance.
Leave the complexities of FSCS compliance to Macro Global. They offer FSCS SCV solutions to banks and financial institutions, allowing them to focus on core business activities, and achieve effortless compliance. reduce costs, enhance depositor trust, maintain a competitive edge.
Contact us today to learn more about how Macro Global can simplify your FSCS compliance journey.
SCV Alliance
FSCS SCV Audit Platform
SCV Forza
FSCS SCV Automation Platform
Provide utmost accuracy and Complete Peace of mind
We will be able to help you in whatever the stage of your regulatory reporting programs
Key FSCS SCV Considerations for Credit Unions and Depositor Safety
Credit unions are co-operative financial institutions offering a wide range of financial products and services like traditional banks. They function as critical entities within the financial domain, providing competitive financial services to their members. However, ensuring depositor protection is crucial, and the Single Customer View helps achieve this. This blog discusses FSCS SCV requirements and guidelines for credit unions to assist them comply with Prudential Regulation Authority standards.
Understanding FSCS SCV Reporting for Credit Unions
The SCV is a comprehensive digital ledger that tracks a member’s holdings across all their credit union accounts. Every detail of a member’s accounts, including their name, address, balance, and account numbers, are contained in it. This consolidated record makes it easy for the PRA to identify depositors and their holdings in the event of a credit union failure. This data is essential for:
Faster Payouts:
If a credit union defaults, the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) can process and pay compensation to qualified depositors quickly with the aid of reliable SCV data.
Enhanced Risk Management:
By employing SCV data for risk assessment, the PRA can guarantee that credit unions uphold sufficient capital buffers to safeguard depositors.
Key SCV Requirements for Credit Unions
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) specifies certain SCV requirements for credit unions to ensure accurate and timely reporting:
Exclusion File: Not Covered Under FSCS
The Exclusions File is an essential component of the Single Customer View (SCV), as it contains accounts that are identified as ‘ineligible’ for FSCS compensation in the event of credit union failure.
It encompasses accounts maintained by institutional investors, local authorities, other credit unions, and significant depositors surpassing FSCS compensation limits, all of which are not classified as “depositors” according to FSCS regulations.
Keeping an accurate exclusion file is important since erroneous inclusions could understate the total compensation needed and incorrect exclusions could result in ineligible accounts obtaining compensation, posing financial concerns.
For managing the exclusion file, credit unions must establish and maintain robust procedures that incorporate transparent audit trails for inclusions and exclusions, precise identification criteria, and timely updates.
SCV System: Upgrades and Changes
Credit unions must inform the PRA of any substantial modifications to their SCV systems that impact the accuracy of the data.
Software updates, modifications to data storage or reporting formats, and adjustments to data acquisition methods are all considered material changes.
These modifications involve introducing new data collection methods or altering data validation protocols. Additionally, software upgrades that implement modifications to data management processes or introduce novel functionalities necessitate notification.
Prompt notification guarantees a seamless transition for SCV reporting and aids the PRA in evaluating possible effects on data authenticity.
Going Digital: SCV Electronic Reporting
Standardised reporting among credit unions is ensured through the PRA’s requirement for electronic submission of SCV data.
To comply with the PRA’s requirements regarding the electronic submission of SCV data, credit unions must adhere to the designated format, implement secure file transfer methods and encryption protocols.
Because it safeguards the transmission of sensitive customer information and meets all applicable deadlines. This practice guarantees effective regulatory oversight and data analysis.
Credit unions should choose an FCA approved independent software vendor like Macro Global who can provide them with a FSCS SCV regulatory reporting software for electronic submissions to RegData.
Dormant Accounts: A Point of Concern
The SCV structure calls for a special handling of dormant accounts, which are accounts that have not been used by a customer for a specific period. Credit unions are required to meticulously identify and report these accounts in the SCV data.
The eligibility criteria for FSCS compensation on dormant accounts vary in comparison to active accounts, and the FSCS offers clear guidance regarding the management of dormant accounts within the SCV framework.
Newcomers to the Game: Newly Authorised Credit Unions
In accordance with PRA requirements, newly authorised credit unions must establish robust Single Customer View (SCV) processes from the outset, including procedures for data collection, reporting, and exclusions management.
Ensuring early compliance prevents potential regulatory issues and guarantees adherence from the moment of authorisation. SCV reporting requirements can be more efficiently navigated with the assistance of the PRA and FSCS.
Keeping a Watchful Eye: Ongoing SCV Verification
In Single Customer View (SCV), precise and reliable data is crucial. It serves as an essential foundation for safeguarding deposits in credit unions. Setting up a compliant SCV system is just the start. Constant SCV verification is essential for ascertaining its continued efficacy.
Ongoing verification is crucial, Because:
- Regular verification ensures the SCV reflects real-time changes and maintains accuracy.
- Helps credit unions to identify and rectify errors before they turn out to be significant issues.
- Demonstrates a proactive approach to data quality and prepares the credit union for periodic reviews by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA).
- Accurate SCV data is critical for effective risk management.
Ongoing SCV Verification Strategies
Automated Data Cleansing and Validation:
Use fully automated FSCS SCV reporting solution to identify and rectify inconsistencies, missing data points, and duplicate entries.Regular Reconciliation with Source Systems:
Ensure consistency and accuracy by reconciling SCV data with the core banking system and other relevant sources.Internal Audits and Reviews:
Conduct periodic internal audits of SCV data and reporting processes against source documents.Third-Party Data Verification:
Partner with third-party service providers for independent assessment of SCV data accuracy.
Beyond Compliance: FSCS SCV's Importance
The benefits of SCV compliance go beyond regulatory requirements. An appropriately managed SCV system can improve internal processes at a credit union by following means:
- More effective account management and better service delivery are made possible by consolidated customer data.
- Precise data helps credit unions create member-focused products and services, promoting data-driven decision making.
- Early error identification prevents costly downstream issues, resulting in reduced operational costs.
- A comprehensive customer view improves risk identification and management, making the credit union and its members safer.
Collaboration is Key
SCV verification is not a daunting task credit unions endure alone. Engaging in partnerships with credible entities can notably enhance the SCV workflow. Here’s where Macro Global steps in, offering robust solutions – SCV Forza and SCV Alliance – that empower credit unions to safeguard depositors through efficient SCV management.
SCV Forza: Championing Data Accuracy and Efficiency
- Automates data gathering, validation, and report generation, ensuring timely and accurate submission of SCV data to the FSCS.
- SCV Forza automates data cleaning and enrichment, addressing inaccurate or incomplete data.
- Integrates with trusted third-party sources to enrich data with valuable details. to enrich data with valuable details.
- SCV Forza promotes robust data governance practices, establishing clear data ownership, access controls, and quality standards.
SCV Alliance: Bolstering Compliance and Risk Management
- SCV Alliance facilitates ongoing verification of customer data for accurate FSCS SCV reporting, offering tools for data reconciliation, discrepancies identification, and regular data quality checks.
- Provides updates and guidance on evolving SCV regulations, minimising risk of regulatory interventions and penalties.
- Offers data analytics capabilities for proactive risk mitigation strategies.
- Enhances data quality via clean & accurate data.
- Streamlines reporting processes.
- Reduces risks by minimising errors and inconsistencies.
- Demonstrates compliance through adherence to SCV regulations.
Moreover, Macro Global’s team of SCV experts provides deep industry knowledge, regulatory insights, implementation guidance, and ongoing support to credit unions, ensuring compliance with SCV regulations, smooth transitions to SCV Forza and SCV Alliance, and addressing challenges.
Take the first step towards stronger depositor protection and efficient SCV management with Macro Global. Contact our SCV specialists and request a free demo!
SCV Alliance
FSCS SCV Audit Platform
SCV Forza
FSCS SCV Automation Platform
Provide utmost accuracy and Complete Peace of mind
We will be able to help you in whatever the stage of your regulatory reporting programs
Joint Regulatory Oversight Committee’s Progress & Roadmap on Open Banking in UK: Macro Global’s View
The Joint Regulatory Oversight Committee (JROC) has provided an update on its efforts to enhance and expand the dynamic sector of open banking, as a response to global trends and technological advancements. By staying competitive with international financial markets, the UK aims to maintain its leadership position in this field. Supporting open banking fosters economic growth, innovation, and competition, benefiting both consumers and businesses alike. Additionally, regulatory mandates and stakeholder engagement drive the JROC’s commitment to ensuring the success of open banking initiatives.
In this blog, we will delve into the UK’s strategic vision for open banking, the enhancement of open banking APIs for better user experiences, and the measures to safeguard against financial crimes like fraud and money laundering. Additionally, we will look at new consumer protection initiatives and improvements in information transparency for third-party providers and end-users. We’ll also touch on innovative pilot projects like non-sweeping Variable Recurring Payments (VRPs), which signal future financial technologies.
Vision and Background
Under JROC’s guidance, the strategic vision aims to transform financial services into a sphere where enhanced accessibility, transparency, and efficiency are not just goals, but standards. This vision embraces the technical, regulatory, consumer protection, and ethical dimensions of banking, ensuring a comprehensive approach to innovation in open banking. By advancing beyond mere compliance, the roadmap sets forth initiatives to improve API reliability, mitigate financial crimes, and expand the variety of services offered through open banking platforms.
A crucial aspect of this vision involves establishing an economically sustainable and independently governed entity. This new body is tasked with overseeing the continuous development of open banking, crafting a framework that is robust enough to adapt to future challenges and opportunities. Its role is pivotal in ensuring that open banking remains viable in the long term and continues to innovate and implement services that become self-sustaining. The progress and strategic objectives laid out by JROC are not just about enhancing the UK’s banking landscape but also about setting a global benchmark for banking practices that prioritize consumer benefits, security, and innovation. This forward-thinking approach is detailed in JROC’s action plans, which highlight achievements to date and outline the next steps towards a more inclusive and innovative financial ecosystem. These efforts highlight the UK’s commitment to leading a global shift towards more dynamic and user-centered financial services.
Detailed Progress Across Key Themes
These efforts by JROC demonstrate a commitment to expanding services, safeguarding against financial crimes, and building a robust framework for user security and dispute resolution. Let us delve into detail, showing how they support the broader goal of a more dynamic, secure, and user-focused open banking landscape.
Enhancing Availability and Performance
A critical focus for the Joint Regulatory Oversight Committee (JROC) has been to ensure that open banking APIs are reliable and efficient across all Account Servicing Payment Service Providers (ASPSPs). This is fundamental for building trust among consumers and businesses, which is crucial for the adoption and scaling of open banking services. Over the past year, considerable progress has been made in this area. A framework for collecting and analysing API performance data was implemented, which allows for continuous monitoring and improvements. This initiative has led to enhanced API uptimes and more consistent service experiences for end-users.
Strengthening Defences Against Financial Crime
Fortifying Consumer Protection Measures
Improving Information Flows to Stakeholders
The flow of information between banks, TPPs, and consumers is crucial for the functionality and trustworthiness of open banking. The JROC has worked to enhance how information is shared within the ecosystem, focusing on the accuracy and timeliness of data transfers. Efforts have included standardising the format and protocol for error and status messages, which helps reduce misunderstandings and improve the overall customer experience. These enhancements facilitate better decision-making by consumers and service providers alike.
Expanding Services Through Innovative Pilots
One of the most exciting developments in the UK’s open banking journey has been the pilot testing of non-sweeping VRPs. This initiative marks a significant expansion in the types of services that can be offered through open banking platforms. The pilot aims to explore and refine the commercial models and consumer protections needed for the broader application of VRPs. If successful, it could lead to a wide range of new financial services that offer greater flexibility and control to consumers.
These thematic areas of progress highlight the JROC’s commitment to not just overseeing the evolution of open banking but actively driving improvements that benefit all participants in the financial ecosystem. By addressing these key areas, the JROC is helping to ensure that open banking continues to grow in a manner that is secure, user-focused, and innovative.
The Long-term Regulatory Framework for Open Banking
The long-term regulatory framework for open banking in the UK is a strategic initiative set by the government to ensure the sector’s sustainable and equitable growth. The framework, as recommended by the Joint Regulatory Oversight Committee in April 2023, is designed to extend beyond the largest banking providers, involving a wider range of financial institutions to foster a competitive and inclusive financial environment.
Legislative Foundations
The government’s intent to legislate a robust framework for open banking was detailed in the Committee’s recommendations. This involves the creation of a smart data scheme, initially proposed under the Data Protection and Digital Information Bill, and now being revised under the Data Protection and Digital Information (No.2) Bill (DPDI Bill). The DPDI Bill, which is currently making its way through Parliament, has been specifically amended to align with the open banking vision, ensuring that the principles set out in the 2023 recommendations are adequately reflected and enforced.
Regulatory and Commercial Model
The framework aims to establish a regulatory environment that supports the full potential of open banking-enabled payments. This includes requiring a broader spectrum of financial firms to engage in open banking, not just the major banks but also smaller financial institutions and fintech companies. The intention is to cultivate a diverse marketplace where innovative payment solutions can thrive under a fair and transparent commercial model. This model will be underpinned by appropriate regulatory backstops to ensure that all participants adhere to the highest standards of consumer protection and data security.
Future Legislation and Governance
In its 2023 Autumn Statement, the government reaffirmed its commitment to these goals, stating its plan to legislate in 2024 to further support this framework. This forthcoming legislation will detail the operational aspects of the smart data scheme and clarify the roles and responsibilities of various stakeholders within the open banking ecosystem. This is aimed at unlocking the full capabilities of open banking technologies while ensuring that consumer interests are safeguarded through robust governance and compliance mechanisms.
Impact and Expectations
The establishment of this long-term regulatory framework is expected to significantly enhance the open banking landscape in the UK. By setting a clear legislative and regulatory path, the government hopes to encourage innovation, improve financial inclusivity, and ensure an elevated level of security and trust among users of financial services. The detailed plans for the smart data scheme, to be outlined in future legislative updates, will further clarify how these objectives will be achieved, marking a pivotal step in the evolution of open banking in the UK.
Open Banking Roadmap
The Open Banking Roadmap outlines a series of strategic initiatives aimed at enhancing the UK’s financial services landscape through open banking. These initiatives focus on improving service reliability, expanding offerings, enhancing security, and setting robust governance structures to guide the future development of open banking.
Levelling Up Availability and Performance
Enhancing the availability and performance of open banking APIs is central to improving user trust and expanding the technology’s adoption. The roadmap aims to develop a consistently high-performing open banking ecosystem by standardising API performance metrics and implementing regular performance audits. This ensures that all financial service providers meet or exceed defined service standards, leading to better and more reliable consumer experiences.
Mitigating the Risks of Financial Crime
To combat the risks associated with financial crimes, the roadmap focuses on establishing an open banking framework with advanced security measures and compliance checks. Initiatives include enhancing the data collection framework to better understand and mitigate fraud trends and integrating innovative security technologies such as biometric verification and encryption to safeguard sensitive financial information.
Ensuring Effective Consumer Protection
The necessity of robust consumer protection mechanisms in open banking is highly emphasised in this roadmap. This includes developing clear guidelines for dispute resolution and fraud compensation. Enhancements to consumer protection will also focus on transparency, ensuring users are well-informed about their rights and the measures in place to protect those rights within the open banking environment.
Improving Information Flows to TPPs and End Users
Improving the flow of information to TPPs and end-users is crucial for the transparency and efficiency of open banking services. The roadmap plans to standardise information-sharing protocols to ensure data accuracy and timeliness, which will aid in decision-making and service personalization, thereby improving the overall user experience.
Promoting Additional Services, Using Non-Sweeping VRPs as a Pilot
The introduction of non-sweeping VRPs marks a significant step towards diversifying the services offered through open banking. The roadmap outlines the pilot testing and evaluation of these services to ensure they meet regulatory standards and consumer needs before a broader rollout. This will potentially unlock new revenue streams and provide consumers with more flexible payment options.
Finalising the Design of the Future Entity
A major component of the roadmap is the establishment of a future entity to oversee the ongoing governance and regulation of open banking. This entity will be designed to ensure sustainability and adaptability in governance structures. The roadmap includes finalising the legal and operational aspects of this entity, setting the stage for its implementation, and ensuring it is equipped to manage the evolving demands of the open banking ecosystem.
Conclusion
The roadmap outlined by the JROC illuminates a path towards a vibrant and consumer-centric future for open banking in the UK. With a steadfast commitment to innovation, enhanced security, and expanded accessibility, the landscape of financial services is set to undergo a profound transformation. As the UK positions itself as a global leader in open banking practices, the journey ahead promises a more inclusive, efficient, and interconnected financial ecosystem.
Through collaborative efforts and ongoing refinement, open banking stands poised to empower individuals, businesses, and society at large, ushering in an era of unparalleled opportunity and prosperity. While navigating this evolution, it is crucial to remain vigilant, adapt to emerging challenges, and stay true to the principles of transparency, fairness, and consumer protection. With each milestone achieved, the vision of a dynamic and resilient open banking landscape becomes ever more tangible, offering boundless potential for growth, innovation, and socioeconomic advancement in the years to come.
Try Macro Global’s
Tavas - Open Banking Product Suite and Solutions
Unlock the future of finance. Get started with Open Banking today.
2024 Supervisory Agenda: The PRA Sets Expectations for International Banks
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has recently released its priorities for international banks and designated investment firms operating in the United Kingdom for 2024 through its “Dear CEO” letter, emphasising the need for strong governance, risk management, and controls to identify, assess, and successfully minimise risks in a competitive operational environment. And PRA’s primary priorities in 2024 are as follows:
Risk Management and Controls
PRA advised non-bank financial institutions (NBFI) to address equity financing difficulties raised in the 2021 and the subsequent “Dear CEO” letters on fixed income financing. Additionally, the following were underscored as its primary concerns:
- Recommends firms avoid segregating risk management and instead consider its ramifications for other businesses.
- Places exclusive attention on counterparty credit risks and secured financing, particularly in relation to non-bank financial institutions.
- Encourages firms to improve their abilities in detecting and evaluating correlations among multiple clients’ financing activities.
- Emphasises market depth, as quantitative tightening diminishes financial system reserves.
- Advocates for the adaptation of risk management frameworks to dynamic macroenvironments, encompassing the potential risks posed by distributed ledger technologies and generative AI.
Financial Resilience
The key message of the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) to financial institutions is to emphasise the importance of managing financial resilience in the face of challenging and uncertain global economic conditions. This involves:
- Maintaining robust treasury management.
- Effectively managing credit portfolios.
- Anticipating ongoing engagement with the PRA on counterparty and credit risk.
- Urging to prepare for the implementation of Basel 3.1 standards.
- Proactively considering changes in funding and liquidity conditions.
- Addressing climate-related financial risks by developing processes to identify, measure, manage, and mitigate these risks.
Operational Resilience
As per the supervisory statement 1/21, the firms must demonstrate the ability to remain within impact tolerances for all important business services (IBS) by March 2025. The PRA anticipates inclusion of the following in the firms’ operational resilience programmes:
- Should have a clear plan to identify and rectify vulnerabilities affecting IBS delivery.
- Resource identification for each IBS.
- Conduct tests using severe yet plausible scenarios to learn from operational disruptions.
- Scenarios should include cyber-related disruptions to understand recovery needs.
- Boards and senior management should actively oversee the delivery of their firms’ operational resilience programme.
- Engagements with third-party providers should be managed in line with supervisory statement 2/21 and firms should consider the impact of outsourcing and third-party relationships on IBS.
- As the RTGS Core Ledger is scheduled to be replaced in June 2024, RTGS Account Holders are expected to manage changes appropriately, participate in the Bank of England’s testing, and go-live activities.
Data Risks
PRA signifies to the financial institutions that accurate, timely, and comprehensive regulatory returns are the foundation of efficient supervision.
- They demand that firms take remedial actions and maintain a steadfast commitment to regulatory reporting in light of the shortcomings they identify in data, governance, systems, and production controls that are associated with regulatory reporting.
- PRA also specifies that targeted supervisory tools and skilled person evaluations will continue to be utilised in this domain through 2024.
Expected Actions from Financial Institutions
Thus, financial institutions are expected to take compelling actions in response to the “Dear CEO” letter from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) regarding its 2024 priorities:
- PRA encourages firms to incorporate precise information, structures, processes, and capabilities into their risk management and governance frameworks.
- The PRA prioritises the need to sustain a robust risk culture, fostering inclusivity and diversity, and establishing guidelines for succession of board and executives.
- It expects firms to have innovative risk management strategies due to emerging technology threats.
- Be forward-thinking in scenario planning to manage extreme tail events effectively.
Consistent with the enumerated priorities, the PRA will persist in overseeing and requesting confirmation that the governance, risk management, and control frameworks of firms are adjusting to the evolving environment.
How Macro Global Empowers International Banks to Address the PRA's 2024 Dear CEO Letter
Macro Global, with its industry leading SCV Forza and SCV Alliance platforms, can directly address the critical areas outlined by the PRA’s Dear CEO letter, helping international banks achieve FSCS compliance, focus on financial & operational resilience, and data governance, and enhance their overall risk management framework.
Addressing Key PRA Priorities:
- Macro Global’s data cleansing and enrichment processes ensure clean, accurate data for stress testing, scenario planning, and risk management.
- Automated reporting with SCV Forza and SCV Alliance platforms improves data collection, validation, and reporting processes, verifying data accuracy and completeness.
- SCV Forza’s data analytics capabilities help banks prioritise remediation efforts based on risk classification (e.g., High, Medium, Low).
- Macro Global’s consultants provide guidance on implementing effective data governance practices, verifying data accuracy and completeness.
- Enables comprehensive audit trials and data reconciliation, fostering transparency and accountability for regulatory scrutiny.
- Macro Global’s solutions ensure adherence to regulatory reporting requirements, minimising the risk of penalties and regulatory interventions.
- Integration with FCA DB, Royal Mail DB through API, Companies House, Charities Register, BFPO Address, OFAC Sanction customer check enhances data quality and compliance.
- Secure data transmission through encryption and robust access controls minimise cyberattack threats.
Macro Global’s solutions empower banks to achieve demonstrably high data quality, operational resilience, and effective controls, ensuring compliance with the PRA’s latest directives and fostering a solid foundation for long-term success.
SCV Alliance
FSCS SCV Audit Platform
SCV Forza
FSCS SCV Automation Platform
Provide utmost accuracy and Complete Peace of mind
We will be able to help you in whatever the stage of your regulatory reporting programs
Customer Pain Points & Solutions – Fully Resolved
The Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS), a UK regulatory agency, protects customers in the unlikely scenario of the failure of financial services firms by compensating the eligible depositors and policyholders of the firm suitably. Financial services firms are obligated to submit a Single Customer View (SCV) report, encompassing personal information, account particulars, and compensation eligibility criteria, within 24 hours of its failure.
SCV reporting is essential for ensuring regulatory compliance, minimising the risk of errors and fraud, and processing claims in a timely and accurate manner. SCV data must be updated regularly by financial services firms. Understanding the FSCS and SCV reporting helps firms comply and protect customers.
Top Challenges faced by financial institutions
Without having a Single Customer View application and real-time insights in place, organisations struggle to deliver renown outcomes and may even result in dissatisfaction and even churn.
Let us look at the top 3 challenges and the resultant bottlenecks faced by the financial institutions.
Relying on Legacy System
This is first and topmost challenge that most of the businesses today have access to an unprecedented amount of customer data.Infrastructure Complexity
The absence of proper infrastructure is preventing banks from effectively managing the situation, in turn seriously affecting the performance of business-critical applications.Operational Effectiveness
IT departments spend 60 to 90% of their budgets managing and maintaining older systems, leaving little left over for new initiatives.
Impacts of Data Quality in SCV reporting
Data quality is of utmost importance within the framework of the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) to ensure accurate, consistent, and reliable customer information.
As it determines the efficacy of validating customer data from various sources and connecting customer touchpoints, data quality is critical to maintain a Single Customer View (SCV).
The presence of inaccurate or inconsistent data may hinder the FSCS’s capacity to identify and consolidate customer information, thereby impeding its ability to deliver compliant and efficient services.
Navigating the Customer Data: Common Challenges
Guaranteeing data integrity frequently poses an immense challenge that includes:
Poor data quality
Characterised by inconsistencies, missing information, and obsolete entries.Data Privacy and Protection:
Characterised by improper control of customer data, risk of unauthorised access leading to data breach.Data duplication
Multiple data entries for the same customer, causing confusion and improper analysis.Inaccurate account holder and customer information
Customer’s names, addresses, and contact information that are not accurate can also impede communication and result in lost opportunities.Inaccurate account segregations
Makes it hard to track key metrics and generate insightful reports.Poor data aggregation
Inability to integrate and structure data from multiple sources hamper the development of a comprehensive customer perspective and hinder decision-making.
Improving data quality impacts various aspects of business operations, such as
- Ensuring timely submission SCV reports
- Achieving compliance with global regulatory privacy standards
- Managing fraud by preventing fake accounts
- Leveraging business intelligence for informed strategies
- Gaining valuable customer insights
- Increasing productivity by streamlining operational processes
Automate your SCV Report Generation
Our FSCS SCV Audit & Automation solution helps you tackle the challenges around gaining a Single Customer View and develop data quality to promote efficiency in operational readiness and improve accuracy in FSCS SCV Regulatory reporting.
We will be able to help you in whatever the stage of your regulatory reporting programs and we are sure you will not be disappointed rather surprised with our offerings and customer success stories. Here is how our all-in-one FSCS SCV Enterprise Solution Suite helps financial institutions to overcome data issues.
Poor Data Quality:
Our SCV Forza – FSCS SCV Automation platform will engage only cleansed data for SCV output generation using Gap study and staging area data.Data Privacy and Protection:
All the SCV related information will be kept in the FSCS SCV server and the SCV output files will only be allowed for authorised users. SCV output files for FSCS submission are highly encrypted and protected with complex password mechanism.Data Duplication:
Data Duplication which is the high-risk issue in SCV files which are managed by the SCV Forza – FSCS SCV Automation platform by using AI based fuzzy logic validations and mechanism.Inaccurate Customer & Account Holder Information:
Customer and Account information are taken from the Core Banking Solutions or staging area in order to comply with the minimum data requirements in SCV files.Poor FSCS standards followed on SCV files generations:
All the FSCS specified standards are strictly followed within our SCV automation platform and the reports are produced with high level accuracy and full compliance.Inaccurate Reporting and Less Informed Decisions:
FSCS SCV Data output at the FSCS SCV report submission will only be carried out after successful validations and mandatory conditional validations demanded by FSCS.Inaccurate Account segregations:
Account segregations are carefully managed using linked accounts and relationship datasets and an accurate reporting is carried out ensuring utmost data integration.Poor Data Aggregation:
Data aggregations will be managed by our SCV Forza – FSCS SCV Automation intelligent platform and an accurate reporting to the satisfaction of FSCS will be ensured.
Our Competitive Advantages
FCA Recognition
We are recognised by the FCA for electronic submissions to RegData, signifying our position as a trusted and FCA recognised independent FSCS SCV regulatory reporting software vendor.
Third-Party Integration
Allows for seamless integration with third-party tools, empowering you to leverage a comprehensive compliance ecosystem.
Automated Regulatory Updates
Our reporting software benefits from periodic regulatory upgrades, guaranteeing you always operate in compliance with the latest regulations.
AI-Powered Algorithms
Utilises AI-based algorithms to automate tasks and generate data-driven insights, enhancing efficiency and accuracy.
Scalable
You can access customer data of any size, ensuring that our solution scales effectively to accommodate your growing business needs.
Optimised
Highly customisable API and the FSCS single customer view reporting application is well optimised for your data environment. This eliminates performance bottlenecks and guarantees smooth operation regardless of data volume.
Insights
Our consultant’s combined Subject Matter Expertise is 70 plus years, and you can fully rely on the quality and integrity of our solution, leveraging this expertise to proactively identify and address potential regulatory challenges.
Screen Data
We help you to screen data with FCA DB, Royal Mail DB through API, Companies House, Charities Register, BFPO Address, OFAC Sanction customer check.
Classified Risks
Well classified SCV audit risks – High, medium, low risk flags for prioritising remediation efforts. This data-driven approach streamlines your remediation process and ensures efficient allocation of resources.
Compare
You can easily compare past single customer view audit reports into benchmark actionable items, empowering you to identify trends and continuously improve your SCV practices.
Analytics
Dozens of reports tick every box for FSCS regulatory compliance requirements. These comprehensive reports provide actionable insights to optimise your compliance posture.
Data Orchestration
Generic Plug-in APIs to any core banking system or data points. This ensures seamless integration with your existing infrastructure, eliminating data silos and streamlining the reporting process.
Fulfilment
We engage start to finish of your FSCS journey with complete handholding, providing ongoing support to ensure smooth and successful implementation.
SCV Alliance
FSCS SCV Audit Platform
SCV Forza
FSCS SCV Automation Platform
Provide utmost accuracy and Complete Peace of mind
We will be able to help you in whatever the stage of your regulatory reporting programs
FSCS SCV Reporting Gets Smarter with AI
AI has transformed the way businesses handle intricate and dynamic compliance issues. They automate and streamline labor-intensive compliance operations, assist financial institutions to process massive volumes of data, generate predictive insights, and get through the complicated regulatory world more quickly, accurately, and easily.
Let us explore the significant influence of AI on FSCS SCV reporting in this article.
Exploring the Role of AI in FSCS Operations
FSCS (Financial Services Compensation Scheme) embraced artificial intelligence (AI) to help process claims, specifically in the London Capital & Finance plc (LCF) case. The sheer volume of evidence and claims required a more efficient solution, leading FSCS to work with partners like Capita, Capgemini, and Microsoft to develop a system using voice-to-text technology to analyse phone recordings.
This AI-driven approach allowed claim handlers to search for specific keywords and phrases in the text, saving time and effort compared to manually listening to each call recording.
By utilising AI, FSCS could start paying compensation to LCF customers earlier than anticipated, halve processing costs, and save customers time and effort in making claims. Despite initial challenges with accuracy, FSCS improved the AI system through machine learning, ensuring more precise outcomes.
The success of AI in the LCF case has led FSCS to consider its future applications in handling high volumes of claims efficiently and cost-effectively. FSCS continues to review and enhance the accuracy of AI results, aiming to leverage this technology further in claims processing.
How should Banks and FIs update themselves with AI for FSCS reporting?
Educate Staff:
Banks and FIs should educate and teach risk managers, technical teams, and senior management about AI in financial services. This training should encompass an examination of both Predictive and Generative AI, in addition to the risks and mitigation strategies associated with both.
Establish AI Governance and Risk Frameworks:
Banks and FIs must create robust AI governance and risk frameworks to meet financial industry AI adoption issues. These frameworks ought to cover consumer results, data privacy, security, accountability, and openness.
Collaborate with Regulators:
Banks and FIs should work with regulators to comply with changing AI legislation. This partnership can foster an environment that is seamless and effective in the implementation of AI.
Adopt Vendor Governance Processes:
Banks and FIs must implement strong mechanisms to mitigate risks associated with acquiring and integrating third-party Generative AI systems. This applies to the management of data, models, and the risk of misuse associated with third parties.
Incorporate AI into Entire Strategy:
Instead of considering AI as a set of discrete solutions, banks and FIs should use it as a ‘system solution’ to improve analysis and decision-making.
Financial institutions should recognise that AI’s value creation will occur in stages and invest in foundational systems that are in line with the potential value creation across these phases.
AI's Impact on Customer Data: Addressing Inaccuracy, Segregation, Duplication, and Cleaning
Customer data is an invaluable resource for organisations in the era of huge amounts of data. However, upholding precise, clean and structured data can present an immense challenge. AI has become a powerful tool for dealing with prevalent issues such as
Inaccurate Customer & Account Holder Information:
Typos, outdated information, and inconsistent formats can lead to errors and inefficiencies.Account Segregations:
Multiple accounts might exist for the same customer due to different branches, products, or historical mergers.Data Duplication:
Redundant entries can inflate customer counts and skew data analysis.Data Cleaning:
Finding and fixing these issues manually takes time and is prone to error.
Addressing Inaccurate Customer & Account Holder Information
Data Matching and Enrichment:
To find and fix inconsistencies, AI algorithms can compare customer data against a wide range of data sources, including internal databases, social media sites (with permission), credit bureaus, and social media platforms.Anomaly Detection:
AI can analyse data trends and identify anomalies such as strange addresses, phone numbers, or email addresses, urging further inquiry and possible data correction.Natural Language Processing (NLP):
By utilising NLP to comprehend and extract pertinent information from unstructured data sources such as legacy onboarding forms used on various applications, and emails, it is possible to augment customer profiles with supplementary particulars.
Identifying and Addressing Account Segregations
Customer 360 View:
By analysing customer behaviour, transaction patterns, and account information, AI is capable of identifying potential connections between accounts that appear to be unrelated. This process aids in the integration of consumer data into a unified profile, thereby furnishing an extensive view of their connection with the organisation.Clustering Algorithms:
AI can classify clients based on shared traits, purchasing habits, or geographical areas. This could help identify instances where a single person has many accounts and facilitate the merging of segregated accounts.Machine Learning:
The past information can be used to train machine learning models to recognise account segregation patterns and merge duplicate accounts.
Eliminating Data Duplication
Techniques for Deduplication:
AI-driven algorithms can detect and remove duplicate items from several data sets using a range of techniques, such as fuzzy matching and probabilistic record linking.Data Profiling:
AI can create typical client profiles via analysing data attributes. Disparities between these profiles could indicate duplicates needing additional study.Entity Resolution:
AI-based entity resolution can find and merge records for the same entity (e.g., customer) even if reported differently.
Enhancing the Process of Data Cleaning
Automated Data Cleansing:
Repetitive duties such as correcting typographical errors, formatting inconsistencies, and standardising data formats can be automated by AI algorithms.Rule-Based Cleaning:
AI can be programmed with precise rules that detect and rectify prevalent data quality concerns, including invalid entries or missing values.Active Learning:
AI models can evolve by identifying data quality issues and recommending the right cleaning methods.
Optimising the FSCS Single Customer View: A Look at Macro Global's AI-powered Approach
The AI-based algorithms incorporated into Macro Global’s FSCS SCV (Single Customer View) products such as SCV Alliance and SCV Forza play a crucial role in enhancing the efficacy and functionality of the FSCS SCV reporting solutions provided to financial institutions.
Here are some key aspects where AI algorithms are prominently utilised:
Data Accuracy and Validation:
Identify and rectify inaccuracies in customer and account information, ensuring that the FSCS SCV reports are accurate and compliant with regulatory standards.
Data Enrichment and Cleansing:
Help in enriching and reconciling data, thereby improving the overall quality of the FSCS SCV reports.
Automated Compliance:
Validates data against various external databases such as FCA DB, Royal Mail DB through API, Companies House, Charities Register, BFPO Address, OFAC Sanction customer check. streamlines the reporting process, reduces manual efforts and ensures adherence to regulatory standards.
Risk Management:
Identify potential risks and issues within the data through the classification of 175 SCV audit checkpoints. Helps in addressing high and medium-risk data issues promptly.
Operational Efficiency:
Automate processes like data validation, enrichment, and reconciliation, enhancing the speed and accuracy of FSCS SCV reporting.
AI-based algorithms within Macro Global’s SCV Alliance and SCV Forza serve as a foundational technology that underpins aforementioned critical functions, ultimately empowering financial institutions to meet their regulatory obligations effectively and efficiently.
SCV Alliance
FSCS SCV Audit Platform
